SPACE
CENTERS:
Science Fiction
Television
From Andromeda to to the X-Files
News, reviews and listings
Movies

Star Wars. The Matrix.
Get the SF Hollywod buzz

Space Text
Space in Print
Looking for a good SF Novel?
News, interviews, reviews
Space Imagined
Original stories and excerpts
Classic authors, new stars
One Step Beyond
UFO's
Flying saucers. Aliens.
Welcome to the conspiracy.
Weird Science
Flying saucers. Aliens.
Welcome to the conspiracy.
Space Madness
Battle Stations
Flying saucers. Aliens.
Welcome to the conspiracy.
Starport Arcade
Flying saucers. Aliens.
Welcome to the conspiracy

Home | About | News | Games                 SPACE.com:   Home | Search | Store
WEIRD SCIENCE
John Shirley's Edge Trends: Bizarre Dangers In Your Future?


By John Shirley
posted: 05:35 pm ET
05 July 2000

Now and then some declaration from a scientist will be an exasperating statement of the obvious. Take this recent headline in a science publication:

"Acrid Smoke from Raging Wildfires Hazardous to Those with Lung, Heart Diseases, National Jewish Physician Says"

Well there’s an insight. If you have lung or heart problems you probably shouldn’t inhale acrid smoke from fires. Ah yes, it would certainly be bad for people with those problems to be downwind of fires. Only -- I would think they’d have guessed that already. What’s next?

"Scientists Warn that Bullet to the Head Damages Brain"

But there are less obvious dangers, real dangers, that scientists are beginning to sending up warning flags about… Real — but bizarre.

We already knew that pollution was a bad thing; that certain pollutants can cause cancer, asthma, birth defects, the whole list. But there are unexpected pollutants -- and odd worries cropping up around new technologies.

The increasing evidence for high-risk factors with the frequent use of cellphones is already famous — no need to go into it here except to say I just got a new cellphone with an earpiece and a remote mike that dangles below my neck, the actual phone can sit on the chair or table, keeping those high-energy frequencies from the transmitter away from my head -- virtually no appreciable risk.

Female problems

And many of us have heard about estrogen pollution a.k.a. female-hormone pollution…

What? Sure you have. Think back to that newspaper article you skimmed before you turned to the stocks page. Pollutants in drag, so to speak, have been a concern for a while. For example, UC Davis’ research on estrogen-like agricultural and industrial pollutants. These pollutants, almost identical to estrogen, mimic some of estrogen’s effects in the body when people absorb them through food and the air and water, interfering with the endocrine systems of humans and animals.

They can trigger, yes, malformations in the testes, reversed sexual characteristics, as well as cancers. The chemicals that break down into estrogen-mimickers are found in pesticides, paints, some plastics, floor wax and shoe polish, and as by-products of incinerating wastes.

So if you’re a man growing breasts and you’re not a transsexual, check to see what you are downwind of.

Medication contamination

Another strange pollution is widespread medication contamination in the water — not from pharmaceutical factories, usually, but from human urine!

In some places, ordinary drinking water is contaminated with small amounts of the most common medicines, especially blood-pressure medications, painkillers, antibiotics, chemotherapy chemicals and tranquilizers.

A woman in the Bengali village of Matlab holds a piece of white sari cloth to '4-fold' it before use as a water filter to avoid cholera. The woman next to her filters and collects water using a pot with a 4-fold of sari cloth.

The pharmaceutical pollutants, in relatively low parts-per-billion, seem to be coming from flushed toilets and sewage sludge spread onto soil, both sources making their way eventually back into groundwater, and reservoirs — and to other major bodies of water: the Danube River, the Po River and the entire North Sea contains measurable quantities of clofibric acid -- a drug used for reducing cholesterol (and, interestingly, a close cousin to a highly toxic weed killer). The drug estradiol, yet another female sex hormone, is present in groundwater in sufficient amounts to alter the sexual characteristics of certain fish in some areas.

The fish. I worry about the fish. Not only do I worry about the sashimi at the sushi restaurant near me that, no kidding, just happens to be next door to a tropical fish store, but I’m also trippin’ on the fish I consume in seafood restaurants. I live in the San Francisco area, where there are frequent and usually futile attempts to warn people not to eat the fish they catch in the Bay because of high levels of dioxins and sewage bacteria. Restaurants, nevertheless, often sell "fresh Bay fish" to us. The National Academy of Sciences estimated that "the risk of cancer to the average consumer who eats seafood can be 75 times greater" if they eat problematic fish such as bluefish, lake trout, Maine lobster and striped bass, which are contaminated with industrial chemicals and pesticides in amounts hundreds to thousands of times greater than other food groups.

Farm-fresh fish

So in order to avoid this sort of thing, I’ve been ordering fish from fish farms, reasoning that they grow in more pristine waters -- only to find out, in the Safe Shopper’s Bible by David Steinman and Samuel Epstein (forward by Ralph Nader -- of course), that fish from fish farms are among the most dangerous to eat because this new industry is unregulated. Hence farm-raised fish contain residues of a wide variety of animal drugs used by the farmer, like anitbiotics and hormones, similar to those used for cattle. The authors recommend fish from the deep sea, like off the coast of New Zealand and Alaska, as reasonably safe.

To be fair, toxicity in fish doesn’t come only from human activity — there are weird, naturally occurring poisons in tropical fork-tailed snapper, barracuda, grouper, mahi-mahi and royal sea bass, created by dinoflagellates called "ciguartera". Besides nasty pains and diarrhea, these natural toxins can cause tres bisarre reversals in sensation; a hot liquid may feel cold and ice may feel hot. Cold water can burn the skin.

Maybe I should just eat, I dunno…Spam. But best not to have that stuff analyzed too rigorously, if you’re going to eat it.

Neurotoxicants and Columbine

One of the most unnerving weird-pollutant issues is the possible relationship between pollutants and behavior, especially in children. Environmental Protection Agency officials in a recent press release acknowledged that PCBs, mercury and other chemical pollutants may be affecting the development of the human brain, causing learning disabilities and behavioral problems in children.

In recent decades learning disabilities and related behavioral problems like attention deficit disorder (ADD) have been radically on the increase; one in every six children measurably suffers from problems such as autism, abnormal aggression, dyslexia and ADD. In California, reported autism rose 210 percent between 1987 and 1998.

Worried scientists like Deborah Rice who did studies for Health Canada, point to neurotoxicants as a likely cause. Neurotoxicants such as PCBs are found in pesticides of all kinds, in head-lice shampoos, insect repellents, and sometimes simply in the air downwind of industry.

Could there be a relationship between neurotoxicants and inexplicable events like the Columbine massacre? You have to wonder.

Spider silk in goat's milk

Of course at least some apparent new "pollution" worries appear to be non-issues, when you look at them closely — so far I don’t see anything convincingly scary about irradiated food, since it doesn’t actually make the food radioactive. Microwave cooking is more radioactive.

But there is something disconcerting about a new technology that genetically mixes spider silk into goat’s milk.

Nexia says spider dragline silk is widely recognized as the strongest material known.

I mean, I like goat’s milk cheese. And I don’t like spiders.

But to be fair, they don’t seem to be making the stuff for drinking or cheese. An outfit called Nexia got interested in finding ways to mass produce spider silk because of its enormous tensile strength and elasticity (presumably, in thicker than usual strands, for human use).

With their "silk glands," spiders produce "dragline" or "frame" silk, which has apparently been That Obscure Object of Desire for materials engineers "because of its extreme performance properties."

Nexia’s product, BioSteel, utilizes similarities between the spider silk gland and mammary glands in goats. In both cases, epithelial cells create the desired proteins in large amounts. Nexia has produced fully soluble spider silk protein in vitro within genetically engineered mammary cell lines. They call it "a transgenic goat system".

Revolting, if you think too much about it — but no doubt useful, even a boon to mankind. Just don’t put it in my cheese.

Tactical high-energy laser

Some people, of course, worry about other kinds of techno-dangers — that is, technology designed to be dangerous. Energy weapons make them nervous — and if so, they’re bound to be diving for cover after the recent successful demonstration of the Army’s Tactical High Energy Laser. This big, ragin’-full-on laser was used to shoot down a Katyusha rocket on June 6 at White Sands. Yes, the blasted (or blasting?) thing finally worked.

"We’ve just turned science fiction into reality," says Lt. General John Costello.

Riding a guide-wire, a small laser-propelled "lightcraft" shoots forward, powered by light.

For my money, laser weapons of this kind are probably less destructive, in the long run, than missiles. Say you developed one to destroy a tank. It could hit its target more accurately, so there are fewer non-combatants at risk. And then there’d be no need for that other frightening 21st-century pollution: low-level radiation poisoning from the depleted uranium warheads used for tank killing, and in certain bombs. Some researchers claim that Kosovo and Kuwait are both now polluted with uranium dust left over from American weapons. Lasers simply wouldn’t do that.

Set phasers on stun

A real electro-blaster may soon be available for cops: a new gun uses a laser to create a path through the air which "clears the way" for a stream of electrons — an artificial, directed lightning bolt that would fly along a beam of UV light, nice and straight, up to 100 meters.

What does the electro-blaster do to you? It’s a case of "set phasers on stun". You’re temporarily paralyzed, dazed, helpless and soon handcuffed. This "freeze ray", the brainchild of Eric Herr at HSV technologies, would initially be the size of a small suitcase.

The usual doomsayers are saying it could blind innocent passersby if it hits them in the eyes…but then a bullet fired instead by the same nearsighted cop would do a lot more than blind that same passerby.

I say bring ‘em on – it’s a more humane peacekeeping device than a .45 automatic. If certain New York cops had had that kind of stun gun recently, Mayor Giuliani wouldn’t have had to do all that political tap-dancing.

So the modern lifestyle is good — but it has its dark side. And conversely there’s modern tech that’s initially scary -- but could actually be good.

We can choose laser weapons, if we want to — but because of poor planning, those bizarre pollutants have so far been foisted on us.

What’s really good … is being able to choose.

 

 

 

Related Stories:

'To Make Children Good': New Fiction by John Shirley

Edgetrends: John Shirley on Surveillance and Ray Guns

Developers of Fiber Optics Snag Top Engineering Prize

Headline.headline

 

 

About | News | Games
SPACE.com: About | Search | Store

webmaster@starport.com
© 2000 SPACE.com, Inc. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Terms of Service and Privacy Policy